Modify

Opened 9 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

Last modified 9 years ago

#79 closed defect (invalid)

Glonass PRN

Reported by: regina.operation@… Owned by: stuerze
Priority: major Component: BNC
Version: Keywords:
Cc:

Description

I use the BNC version 2.12.1 and i notice that the PRN of glonass ephemeris are bad value (for rinex3.03 and rinex 2.11). For example a part of glonass ephemeris file (rinex 2.11):

51 16 5 24 14 15 0.0 3.240257501602e-04 3.637978807092e-12 5.040000000000e+04

We can see that the PRN is 51. Old version 2.11.1 take into account the good value of PRN.

Change History (11)

comment:1 by stuerze, 9 years ago

Dear Colleague,

would you be so kind and provide me your BNC configuration file, so that I can see, what your input data are?

Thanks and best regards,
Andrea.

Last edited 9 years ago by stuerze (previous) (diff)

comment:2 by stuerze, 9 years ago

.. another good help to reproduce your error case would be small raw file: https://software.rtcm-ntrip.org/export/HEAD/ntrip/trunk/BNC/src/bnchelp.html#rawout

Regards, Andrea

by regina.operation@…, 9 years ago

Attachment: BNC.bnc added

configuration file

by regina.operation@…, 9 years ago

Attachment: raw_BRDC_rx3_files.zip added

part of Raw, BRDC and observation files

comment:3 by stuerze, 9 years ago

The erroneous GLONASS PRNs seem to be part of your RTCM input data stream. There are not many possibilities to make a decoding error and an independent software decodes such strange GLONASS PRNs as well:

RTCM3 (2016-05-25T08:59:03.28) Type 1020 (size 45):
  SV= 40, Freq=  5, tk=11:30:00(41400s), tb=11:45:00(705min,42300s)
  Almanac health=true (valid)
  X= 15920.4995117km, X velocity=     2.4971581km/s, X acceleration=  -9.31323e-10km/s2
  Y= -7985.3676758km, Y velocity=     0.0231647km/s, Y acceleration=   9.31323e-10km/s2
  Z= 18286.9921875km, Z velocity=    -2.1719027km/s, Z acceleration=  -9.31323e-10km/s2
  P1=1, P2=1, P3=0, Ephemeris health=0
  GammaN=9.09495e-13, tauN=-7.0611e-05, EN= 0, M=1
  GLONASS-M: P=1, ln(3)=0, delta tau=-2.79397e-09, P4=0, Ft=10, Nt= 146
  Additional Data=valid:
   NA= 146, tauC=-0.0000000140s
   GLONASS-M: N4= 6, tauGPS=-0.0000000224s, ln(5)=0
RTCM3 (2016-05-25T08:59:43.42) Type 1020 (size 45):
  SV= 58, Freq=  4, tk=11:30:00(41400s), tb=11:45:00(705min,42300s)
  Almanac health=true (valid)
  X= -5028.6523438km, X velocity=    -1.2788105km/s, X acceleration=   9.31323e-10km/s2
  Y= 12430.7070312km, Y velocity=    -2.6841803km/s, Y acceleration=   3.72529e-09km/s2
  Z= 21704.7304688km, Z velocity=     1.2393589km/s, Z acceleration=             0km/s2
  P1=1, P2=1, P3=0, Ephemeris health=0
  GammaN=1.81899e-12, tauN=-6.55986e-05, EN= 0, M=1
  GLONASS-M: P=1, ln(3)=0, delta tau=9.31323e-10, P4=1, Ft= 8, Nt= 146
  Additional Data=valid:
   NA= 146, tauC=-0.0000000140s
   GLONASS-M: N4= 6, tauGPS=-0.0000000224s, ln(5)=0

comment:4 by stuerze, 9 years ago

It seems to be an error with respect to septentrio receivers only. If I switch of all septentrio reseiver in our ephemeris stream generation I didn't get such strange GLONASS PRNs.

comment:5 by stoecker, 9 years ago

Resolution: invalid
Status: newclosed

Closing as invalid. Anyway the reason for the error in the original data should be investigated and reported to the relevant place (Septentrio)?

comment:6 by stuerze, 9 years ago

It's reported to 'support@…'

comment:7 by anonymous, 9 years ago

Dear Colleagues from "regina.operation",

The septentrio support team has written the following:

To get a better understanding of this issue, could you please send us the diagnostic report of the receiver? The diagnostic report can be generated in RxControl from File > Display Diagnostic Report. Could you please also tell us in which RTCM message this issue is observed?

May I ask you to deliver the mentioned report to support at septentrio.com because we don't pursue such a receiver? We observed the issue within message type 1020 (GLONASS ephemeris).

Thanks and best regards,
Andrea.

comment:8 by stuerze, 9 years ago

The septentrio support team has meanwhile written the following:

I can inform you that I was in the meantime able to reproduce this. We are currently investigating this further and I will keep you informed.

comment:9 by stuerze, 9 years ago

New message from Septentrio support team:

We have now fixed the issue in RTCM MT1020 in v2.9.4 of the PolaRx4 firmware. The GLONASS satellite numbers are now correctly,

Add Comment


E-mail address and name can be saved in the Preferences .
 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.