Opened 7 days ago
Last modified 32 minutes ago
#216 new defect
Galileo HAS corrections vary from ones, recieved via E6B signal
| Reported by: | Owned by: | stuerze | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Component: | BNC |
| Version: | BNC 2.1 | Keywords: | Galileo HAS, correction stream |
| Cc: |
Description
A discrepancy has been observed in the Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS) orbit corrections when comparing data distributed via BNC Ntrip Caster against data received directly from the Galileo E6B Signal-in-Space (SIS).
The issue affects the radial component of the orbit corrections. The streams recieved through BNC show a measurable offset in the radial component (orbit correction) compared to the same data, recieved via SIS. This affects whole Galileo constellation (~8-10cm offset) and several GPS satellites (~65-70cm offset). Two files with corrections are attached.
Thank you in advance.
With regards,
Vladyslav Kerker.
Attachments (4)
Change History (7)
by , 7 days ago
| Attachment: | SEPT2024361_HAS_clipped.ssr added |
|---|
by , 7 days ago
| Attachment: | SSRA00EUH0_S_20243610000_01D_MC_clipped.ssr added |
|---|
HAS Corrections, recieved via BNC.
comment:1 by , 6 days ago
| Priority: | normal → major |
|---|
comment:2 by , 4 days ago
Dear Vladyslav Kerke,
Thank you very much for this interesting observation. Especially the differences with respect to GPS would explain the sometimes very poor PPP results using both, GPS+Galileo HAS corrections.
Nevertheless, do you think, it is really a problem of BNC? BNC only decodes the RTCM messages provided by EUSPA:
https://www.gsc-europa.eu/galileo/services/galileo-high-accuracy-service-has/internet-data-distribution
Maybe you should contact the provider of the Internet based Galileo HAS corrections with your observations. Perhaps with a current example from 2026?
Best regars, Andrea
comment:3 by , 32 minutes ago
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your responce. I contacted EUSPA and their responce suggests that the GPS offset may be related to Inter-System Bias between GPS and Galileo.
After conducting more tests, I am almost certain that the problem is not related to ISB.
The 70cm offset is present only in GPS BLOCK III satellites. Moreover, it is not only present in HAS correction stream but also in SSRA00BKG1, SSRA03IGS1 (files attached) and, as I suspect, every SSR correction source that includes GPS BLOCK III satellites. BLOCK 3 includes following satellites: G20, G04, G18, G23, G14, G11, G28, G01. For each of those satellites, Radial orbit correction sits at -0.7m, while for other GPS Blocks there is no such offset.
My personal guess is that BNC may be using outdated ANTEX file when forming corrections, which contains incorrect or outdated Phase Center Offset values (PCO) for GPS BLOCK 3. I would kindly ask you to check it.
Thank you for your time,
Vladyslav Kerker.
by , 30 minutes ago
| Attachment: | SSRA03IGS1_S_20260631300_01H_MC_clipped.ssr added |
|---|
IGS RTS corrections

HAS Corrections, recieved via SIS and BNC.