Opened 21 months ago
Closed 17 months ago
#177 closed defect (fixed)
RTCM3.1 vs binex observables are differentes in BNC v.2.13
| Reported by: | Owned by: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | BNC |
| Version: | Keywords: | ||
| Cc: |
Description
I am getting streaming data from same Trimble NetR9 receiver but using different format, basically binex and RTCM 3.1.
The observable in rinex file that I get are differents and I can no t figure out the reason.
Could you help me, please?
Attachments (2)
Change History (4)
by , 21 months ago
| Attachment: | MAR10570.24O_fromBinex added |
|---|
by , 21 months ago
| Attachment: | MAR10570.24O.fromRTCM added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 21 months ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → needinfo |
Dear Ivonne,
I have no experiences with BINEX data so far but with respect to RTCM and RINEX I can say: Only the so called RTCM Multiple Signal Messages (MSM) allow a maximum compatibility with RINEX version 3/4. Lagacy RTCM messages as well as RINEX version 2 have limitations. In more detail MSM5 is able to transmit a full set of RINEX observables and MSM7 does the same with extended resolution. Maybe you can check your source format in more detail.
Best regrads, Andrea
comment:2 by , 17 months ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | needinfo → closed |

Rinex file created from RTC streaming