wiki:TracQuery

Version 3 (modified by trac, 10 years ago) ( diff )

--

Trac Ticket Queries

In addition to reports, Trac provides support for custom ticket queries, which can be used to display tickets that meet specified criteria.

To configure and execute a custom query, switch to the View Tickets module from the navigation bar, and select the Custom Query link.

Filters

When you first go to the query page, the default filter will display tickets relevant to you:

  • If logged in then all open tickets, it will display open tickets assigned to you.
  • If not logged in but you have specified a name or email address in the preferences, then it will display all open tickets where your email (or name if email not defined) is in the CC list.
  • If not logged in and no name/email is defined in the preferences, then all open issues are displayed.

Current filters can be removed by clicking the button to the left with the minus sign on the label. New filters are added from the pulldown lists at the bottom corners of the filters box; 'And' conditions on the left, 'Or' conditions on the right. Filters with either a text box or a pulldown menu of options can be added multiple times to perform an Or on the criteria.

You can use the fields just below the filters box to group the results based on a field, or display the full description for each ticket.

After you have edited your filters, click the Update button to refresh your results.

Some shortcuts can be used to manipulate checkbox filters.

  • Clicking on a filter row label toggles all checkboxes.
  • Pressing the modifier key while clicking on a filter row label inverts the state of all checkboxes.
  • Pressing the modifier key while clicking on a checkbox selects the checkbox and deselects all other checkboxes in the filter.

The modifier key is platform and browser dependent. On Mac the modified key is Option/Alt or Command. On Linux the modifier key is Ctrl + Alt. Opera on Windows seems to use Ctrl + Alt, while Alt is effective for other Windows browsers.

Clicking on one of the query results will take you to that ticket. You can navigate through the results by clicking the Next Ticket or Previous Ticket links just below the main menu bar, or click the Back to Query link to return to the query page.

You can safely edit any of the tickets and continue to navigate through the results using the Next/Previous/Back to Query links after saving your results. When you return to the query any tickets which were edited will be displayed with italicized text. If one of the tickets was edited such that it no longer matches the query criteria , the text will also be greyed. Lastly, if a new ticket matching the query criteria has been created, it will be shown in bold.

The query results can be refreshed and cleared of these status indicators by clicking the Update button again.

Saving Queries

Trac allows you to save the query as a named query accessible from the reports module. To save a query ensure that you have Updated the view and then click the Save query button displayed beneath the results. You can also save references to queries in Wiki content, as described below.

Note: one way to easily build queries like the ones below, you can build and test the queries in the Custom report module and when ready - click Save query. This will build the query string for you. All you need to do is remove the extra line breaks.

Note: you must have the REPORT_CREATE permission in order to save queries to the list of default reports. The Save query button will only appear if you are logged in as a user that has been granted this permission. If your account does not have permission to create reports, you can still use the methods below to save a query.

You may want to save some queries so that you can come back to them later. You can do this by making a link to the query from any Wiki page.

[query:status=new|assigned|reopened&version=1.0 Active tickets against 1.0]

Which is displayed as:

Active tickets against 1.0

This uses a very simple query language to specify the criteria, see Query Language.

Alternatively, you can copy the query string of a query and paste that into the Wiki link, including the leading ? character:

[query:?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=owner Assigned tickets by owner]

Which is displayed as:

Assigned tickets by owner

Customizing the table format

You can also customize the columns displayed in the table format (format=table) by using col=<field>. You can specify multiple fields and what order they are displayed in by placing pipes (|) between the columns:

[[TicketQuery(max=3,status=closed,order=id,desc=1,format=table,col=resolution|summary|owner|reporter)]]

This is displayed as:

Results (1 - 3 of 142)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Ticket Resolution Summary Owner Reporter
#221 fixed RTCM3 MSM QZSS L1C/B support stuerze info@…
#220 fixed Question about code BIA states and ionosphere constraints in BNC PPP stuerze asdf123hb67@…
#219 worksforme make me download this pls stuerze riccardo.zordan2000@…
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Full rows

In table format you can also have full rows by using rows=<field>:

[[TicketQuery(max=3,status=closed,order=id,desc=1,format=table,col=resolution|summary|owner|reporter,rows=description)]]

This is displayed as:

Results (1 - 3 of 142)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Ticket Resolution Summary Owner Reporter
#221 fixed RTCM3 MSM QZSS L1C/B support stuerze info@…
Description

Have noticed Trimble Alloy and Septentrio PolaRx5 RTCM3 MSM streams now including a new signal that appears to be 1E. Septentrio note in their 5.7.0 firmware update that the QZSS L1C/B signal can now be enabled in RTCM3 MSM streams. This mapping has been added to the RTKLIB fork see https://github.com/rtklibexplorer/RTKLIB/blob/main/src/rtcm3.c#L106 Made a similar addition to a local BNC build and it appears to be logging the RTCM streams to rinex files as expected - it did need local skeleton files that added the 1E signal. Noted some header defaults in src/rinex/rnxobsfile.cpp and signal priorities, and should QZSS 1E be added to these, it does not seem necessary for logging as stream to rinex.

Index: src/RTCM3/RTCM3Decoder.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/RTCM3/RTCM3Decoder.cpp	(revision 10930)
+++ src/RTCM3/RTCM3Decoder.cpp	(working copy)
@@ -356,12 +356,12 @@
 static struct CodeData qzss[RTCM3_MSM_NUMSIG] = {
         {0.0, 0},
         {GPS_WAVELENGTH_L1, "1C"},
+        {GPS_WAVELENGTH_L1, "1E"},
         {0.0, 0},
         {0.0, 0},
         {0.0, 0},
         {0.0, 0},
         {0.0, 0},
-        {0.0, 0},
         {QZSS_WAVELENGTH_L6, "6S"},
         {QZSS_WAVELENGTH_L6, "6L"},
         {QZSS_WAVELENGTH_L6, "6X"},

#220 fixed Question about code BIA states and ionosphere constraints in BNC PPP stuerze asdf123hb67@…
Description

Dear BNC developers,

I am currently studying the PPP/PPP-AR model implemented in BNC 2.13.6, especially the dual-frequency uncombined PPP parameterization in the src/PPP/ path. I would like to ask for clarification about the theoretical interpretation of the code BIA states and the ionosphere constraint model in BNC.

In a GPS-only test configuration, for example:

PPP/lcGPS=P12&L12 PPP/constraints=no

my understanding is that the LC string is parsed as:

cG1, cG2, lG1, lG2

At the same time, the PPP filter creates the following code-bias-like states:

BIA cG1 BIA cG2

together with per-satellite ionosphere states ION and per-satellite, per-phase-LC ambiguity states. From my current reading of the source code and the PPP output, BIA cG1/cG2 appear to be real Kalman filter states, not merely diagnostic output quantities.

We also noticed that the common mode of BIA cG1/cG2 is datum-coupled with the receiver clock. BNC seems to regularize this direction through the prior variance of the code BIA states, for example through aprSigCodeBias. Therefore, we do not think that the absolute values of BIA cG1/cG2 should be interpreted as independently observable physical receiver code hardware delays.

According to my understanding of conventional dual-frequency UDUC PPP, when no external ionosphere product is used as a constraint, receiver code biases are usually not estimated as a separate receiver DCB parameter. Instead, they are absorbed through re-parameterization into receiver clock, ionosphere states, ambiguities, and related datum definitions. Explicit handling of receiver DCB becomes necessary mainly in ionosphere-constrained PPP, where GIM, SSR/VTEC/STEC, or regional ionosphere products are used to constrain the ionosphere states. Otherwise, receiver code biases may contaminate the ionosphere states and cause datum inconsistency with the external ionosphere constraints.

Therefore, my main question is why BNC still estimates BIA cG1/cG2 for the dual-frequency code LCs even when:

PPP/constraints=no

This seems different from a conventional minimal full-rank UDUC PPP parameterization. It looks more like a code-LC-wise bias-like nuisance-state parameterization.

Under this interpretation, BIA cG1/cG2 can be re-parameterized into a receiver-clock common component and a receiver-DCB-like differential combination, for example:

DCB_like = BIA cG2 - BIA cG1

However, the absolute values of BIA cG1/cG2 would then be datum-dependent and prior-dependent.

Could you please help clarify the following points?

  1. What is the intended interpretation of BIA cG1 and BIA cG2? Should they be interpreted as physical receiver code hardware delays, or rather as datum-dependent code-bias-like nuisance states?
  2. Why does BNC estimate separate BIA cG1/cG2 states for the enabled code LCs in dual-frequency uncombined PPP even when constraints=no and no external ionosphere constraint is used?
  3. What is the recommended interpretation of aprSigCodeBias in the BNC model? Is it mainly a numerical regularization parameter, or should it also be understood as a physical prior for receiver code biases?
  4. When ionosphere constraints are enabled, for example using GIM/IONEX or real-time SSR/VTEC/STEC ionosphere corrections, what exactly does the BNC ION state represent?an absolute slant ionosphere delay, or a residual correction with respect to the external ionosphere model?
  5. Does the ionosphere pseudo-observation directly constrain the absolute value of the ION state, or does BNC first apply the external SSR/GIM ionosphere correction on the computed side and then constrain the residual ION state close to zero?
  6. If the receiver code-bias datum and the external ionosphere-model datum are not perfectly consistent, why does BNC use an absolute ionosphere pseudo-observation rather than, for example, a satellite-differenced ionosphere constraint or an explicit receiver DCB random-walk parameter?
  7. Is the BIA cG1/cG2 code BIA parameterization mainly intended to support ionosphere-constrained PPP, especially real-time SSR/VTEC/STEC ionosphere constraints, by reducing receiver-code-bias contamination in the ionosphere state? If so, why is the same code BIA parameterization retained when constraints=no?

I am asking these questions because this implementation appears to differ from some common IC-PPP formulations in the literature, where receiver DCB is explicitly handled mainly when external ionosphere constraints are introduced. In BNC, the BIA cG* states look more like code-LC-wise bias-like nuisance states, and they seem to be used independently of whether ionosphere constraints are enabled. I would like to understand and document the BNC model correctly and avoid misinterpreting these states as directly observable physical receiver hardware delays.

Thank you very much for providing BNC as open-source software, and thank you in advance for your help in clarifying these model details.

Best regards, Melissa Grove

#219 worksforme make me download this pls stuerze riccardo.zordan2000@…
Description

Hello, i'd like to download the ntrip files but it seems like you can only download them one at a time, i'm a uni student doing a project.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Query Language

query: TracLinks and the [[TicketQuery]] macro both use a mini “query language” for specifying query filters. Filters are separated by ampersands (&). Each filter consists of the ticket field name, an operator and one or more values. More than one value are separated by a pipe (|), meaning that the filter matches any of the values. To include a literal & or | in a value, escape the character with a backslash (\).

The available operators are:

= the field content exactly matches one of the values
~= the field content contains one or more of the values
^= the field content starts with one of the values
$= the field content ends with one of the values

All of these operators can also be negated:

!= the field content matches none of the values
!~= the field content does not contain any of the values
!^= the field content does not start with any of the values
!$= the field content does not end with any of the values

The date fields created and modified can be constrained by using the = operator and specifying a value containing two dates separated by two dots (..). Either end of the date range can be left empty, meaning that the corresponding end of the range is open. The date parser understands a few natural date specifications like "3 weeks ago", "last month" and "now", as well as Bugzilla-style date specifications like "1d", "2w", "3m" or "4y" for 1 day, 2 weeks, 3 months and 4 years, respectively. Spaces in date specifications can be omitted to avoid having to quote the query string.

created=2007-01-01..2008-01-01 query tickets created in 2007
created=lastmonth..thismonth query tickets created during the previous month
modified=1weekago.. query tickets that have been modified in the last week
modified=..30daysago query tickets that have been inactive for the last 30 days

See also: TracTickets, TracReports, TracGuide, TicketQuery

Note: See TracWiki for help on using the wiki.